Many descriptions of the scientific method are oversimplified, leaving students with the false impression that library research and writing are not integral parts of the science research process. The outline below includes these critical components.
Interestingly, the stages of the scientific research process are very similar to the stages of the library research process. So that students can see the parallels between them, I have based this outline of the scientific method on the Information Search Process (ISP) framework from Carol Kuhlthau of Rutgers University.
Stage 1: Task Initiation
The scientist recognizes the need for information in some area. This need could arise from his or her own curiosity, from an outside request, or from any number of other sources. For example, a chemist working for an energy company might recognize the need for a non-petroleum automobile fuel to replace gasoline.
Stage 2: Topic Selection
The scientist chooses a general area to investigate. For example, the chemist interested in gasoline alternatives might decide to explore fuels made from plant materials.
Stage 3: Topic Exploration
The scientist explores what is already known about his or her chosen topic. This stage is also called a “review of the literature.” For example, our chemist might use the books and online databases of her company’s library or a university library to find scientific publications about alternative fuels. She might investigate the chemical reactions of combustion (oxidation), the required chemical & physical properties of automobile fuels, the process of turning plant materials into liquid fuel (refinement), and the problems others have encountered with plant-based fuels.
Stage 4: Focus Formulation
The scientist chooses a specific area to investigate further. He or she will narrow the topic to a specific situation to be examined, and will state this as a hypothesis to be tested. For example, our chemist might find in her review of the literature that a plant-based fuel developed in the 1970s was abandoned because it did not burn properly in the cars of that era. She might decide to “replicate,” or repeat, an experiment that was performed back then, but this time using a computer-controlled engine like those found in modern cars. Her hypothesis might be, “If the test fuel is used to power an automobile engine with computerized fuel and ignition controls, the engine’s combustion efficiency will be higher than when powered with gasoline.”
Stage 5: Information Collection
The scientist conducts an experiment to test the hypothesis. For example, our chemist might design a test with two identical engines, one burning gasoline and the other burning the test fuel. She might measure the combustion efficiency of the two engines by tracking how much fuel they consume compared to their power output and sampling the exhaust gases they produce for signs of incomplete combustion.
Stage 6: Presentation of Findings
The scientist interprets the data collected in the experiment and documents the results. For example, our chemist might find that the fuel she is testing performs the same as (but not better than) gasoline. (Notice that although her hypothesis is wrong, her results are still important.) She might document her findings in an internal company report or publish them in a scientific journal article.